Psychology and legal change: The impact of a decade.
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 17 (4) , 371-398
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044374
Abstract
This article takes stock of one aspect of psychologically based empirical jurisprudence-its role in legal change over the last decade. It assesses the ways in which the increased involvement of psychology in the legal process has influenced and affected the nature and direction of legal change. While acknowledging very real and tangible successes, it also identifies several problem areas, ones whose significance may grow in light of an increasingly unsympathetic, conservative judiciary. The direction of psychology and law, as an applied academic discipline, and the future of empirically based legal change are also examined.Keywords
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expert testimony on decision processes in employment cases.Law and Human Behavior, 1992
- The Fourteenth Amendment and symbolic legality: Let them eat due process.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Social science data and the APA: The Lockhart brief as a case in point.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Boats against the current: A rebuttal.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Boats against the current: A note on the effects of imprisonment.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- The misbegotten marriage of soft psychology and bad law: Psychological self-defense as a justification for homicide.Law and Human Behavior, 1990
- Psychological self-defense: A proposed justification for battered women who kill.Law and Human Behavior, 1990
- Sanguinity and disillusionment where law meets social science.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Criminal justice and the nineteenth-century paradigm: The triumph of psychological individualism in the "formative era."Law and Human Behavior, 1982
- Children's competency to testify.Law and Human Behavior, 1981