What's wrong with Libertarianism
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review
- Vol. 11 (3) , 407-467
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819708443469
Abstract
Libertarian arguments about the empirical benefits of capitalism are, as yet, inadequate to convince anyone who lacks libertarian philosophical convictions. Yet “philosophical” libertarianism founders on internal contradictions that render it unfit to make libertarians out of anyone who does not have strong consequentialist reasons for libertarian belief. The joint failure of these two approaches to libertarianism explains why they are both present in orthodox libertarianism—they hide each other's weaknesses, thereby perpetuating them. Libertarianism retains significant potential for illuminating the modern world because of its distance from mainstream intellectual assumptions. But this potential will remain unfulfilled until its ideological superstructure is dismantled.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Freedom, self‐ownership, and libertarian philosophical DiasporaCritical Review, 1997
- Is Government Too Political?Foreign Affairs, 1997
- Hayek's political philosophy and his economicsCritical Review, 1997
- Economic approaches to politicsCritical Review, 1995
- Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social CapitalJournal of Democracy, 1995
- The reflections of a grumpPublic Choice, 1993
- The growth of governmentCritical Review, 1993
- Can Keynesianism explain the 1930s? Reply to CowenCritical Review, 1991
- Democracy as a spontaneous orderCritical Review, 1989
- Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current ResearchPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1985