A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 88 (6) , 2645-2655
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399985
Abstract
A new unbiased adaptive procedure is described that requires only half as many presentations in achieving the same precision as the well-known two-interval forced-choice (2IFC) 2-step procedure. The procedure is based on a yes–no task which avoids redundant presentation time. Furthermore, certain psychophysical studies can only be realized with yes–no tasks. Every trial contains randomly presented signals or noises and the answer is either yes or no. The outcome (hit, miss, false alarm, correct rejection) is taken into account by adjusting the signal level in a staircase manner. The adjustment matrix is set up to induce a neutral response criterion. Its convergence point can be adjusted at will. The single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure is compared to von Békésy and 2IFC transformed up–down methods using a Monte-Carlo simulation. The SIAM procedure proves to be the fastest of the unbiased procedures. A test on four subjects verified these results. Implications for optimum track length and the number of reversals to discard are discussed.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: A comparison of human data and a mathematical modelThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988
- Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Two-alternative versus three-alternative procedures for threshold estimationPerception & Psychophysics, 1984
- PEST reduces bias in forced choice psychophysicsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1983
- A procedure for detecting variability of psychophysical thresholdsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1983
- Comparison of three adaptive psychophysical proceduresThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982
- Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981
- PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability FunctionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967