On discontinuing dialysis.
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 19 (2) , 77-81
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.19.2.77
Abstract
Ethical issues relating to the withdrawal of dialysis are discussed, comparing dialysis with other life-support systems, particularly artificial ventilation. It is argued that there is no ethical difference between discontinuing treatment in each case. One practical difference between the two is that patients with chronic renal failure are less likely to have reduced autonomy, and so can engage in discussions with their doctors regarding the situations in which their life-supporting treatment might be discontinued. It is argued that doctors caring for patients on dialysis have an ethical duty to discuss with these patients the circumstances in which they may wish to discontinue dialysis.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of advanced chronic renal failure and the need for end stage renal replacement treatment.BMJ, 1990
- Can we meet the real need for dialysis and transplantation?BMJ, 1990
- The Appleton Consensus: suggested international guidelines for decisions to forego medical treatment.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1989
- Euthanasia, withholding life-prolonging treatment, and moral differences between killing and letting die.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1988
- CHOOSING DEATH - WITHDRAWAL FROM CHRONIC DIALYSIS WITHOUT MEDICAL REASON1988
- Stopping Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment: Psychiatric Considerations in the Termination of Renal DialysisThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1981
- Active and Passive EuthanasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975