Migraine Care Among Different Ethnicities: Do Disparities Exist?
- 25 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
- Vol. 46 (5) , 754-765
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00453.x
Abstract
Objective.—Evaluate whether, in a primary care setting, Caucasians (C) and African Americans (AA) with moderately to severely disabling migraines differed in regards to: utilizing the health‐care system for migraine care, migraine diagnosis and treatment, level of mistrust in the health‐care system, perceived communication with their physician, and perceived migraine triggers. Background.—Research has documented ethnic disparities in pain management. However, almost no research has been published concerning potential disparities in utilization, diagnosis, and/or treatment of migraine. It is also important to consider whether ethnic differences exist for trust and communication between patients and physicians, as these are essential when diagnosing and treating migraine. Methods.—Adult patients with headache (n = 313) were recruited from primary care waiting rooms. Of these, 131 (AA = 77; C = 54) had migraine, moderate to severe headache‐related disability, and provided socioeconomic status (SES) data. Participants completed measures of migraine disability (MIDAS), migraine health‐care utilization, diagnosis and treatment history, mistrust of the medical community, patient–physician communication (PPC), and migraine triggers. Analysis of covariance (controlling for SES and recruitment site), chi‐square, and Pearson product moment correlations were conducted. Results.—African Americans were less likely to utilize the health‐care setting for migraine treatment (AA = 46% vs. C = 72%, P < .001), to have been given a headache diagnosis (AA = 47% vs. C = 70%, P < .001), and to have been prescribed acute migraine medication (AA = 14% vs. C = 37%, P < .001). Migraine diagnosis was low for both groups, and P < .001, η2= 0.26) and less positive PPC (P < .001, η2= 0.11). Also, the lower the trust and communication, the less likely they were to have ever seen (or currently be seeing) a doctor for migraine care or to have been prescribed medication. Conclusions.—Migraine utilization, diagnosis, and treatment were low for both groups. However, this was especially true for African Americans, who also reported lower levels of trust and communication with doctors relative to Caucasians. The findings highlight the need for improved physician and patient education about migraine diagnosis and treatment, the importance of cultural variation in pain presentation, and the importance of communication when diagnosing and treating migraine.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Self‐Administered Behavioral Intervention Using Tailored Messages for MigraineHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 2005
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Acute Migraine: A Comparison Between Ethnic GroupsHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 2001
- Race, Ethnicity, and Pain Treatment: Striving to Understand the Causes and Solutions to the Disparities in Pain TreatmentJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2001
- Race, Ethnicity, and the Health Care System: Public Perceptions and ExperiencesMedical Care Research and Review, 2000
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Access to Medical CareMedical Care Research and Review, 2000
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Access to and Use of Health Care Services, 1977 to 1996Medical Care Research and Review, 2000
- Triggers of Headache Episodes and Coping Responses of Headache Diagnostic GroupsHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1995
- How white and African Americans view their health and social problems. Different experiences, different expectationsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Precipitating Factors in Migraine: A Retrospective Review of 494 PatientsHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1994
- Racial Differences in the Use of Drug Therapy for HIV Disease in an Urban CommunityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994