Discussion: Should Ecologists Become Bayesians?
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Applications
- Vol. 6 (4) , 1095-1103
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2269594
Abstract
Bayesian statistics involve substantial changes in the methods and philosophy of science. Before adopting Bayesian approaches, ecologists should consider carefully whether or not scientific understanding will be enhanced. Frequentist statistical methods, while imperfect, have made an unquestioned contribution to scientific progress and are a workhorse of day‐to‐day research. Bayesian statistics, by contrast, have a largely untested track record. The papers in this special section on Bayesian statistics exemplify the difficulties inherent in making convincing scientific arguments with Bayesian reasoning.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bayes FactorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- On Improving the Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1991
- [The 1988 Wald Memorial Lectures: The Present Position in Bayesian Statistics]: RejoinderStatistical Science, 1990
- Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of ProbabilityPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1937