Primary Care Physician Compensation Method in Medical Groups
Open Access
- 18 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 279 (11) , 853-858
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.11.853
Abstract
IN TODAY'S health care environment, physicians, their patients, health care leaders, and public policymakers are confronting the challenges of managed care. Financial incentives and externally imposed utilization management constraints are being applied to medical practice with unprecedented intensity in a climate of increased competition and cost consciousness. Despite professional and public concern regarding the impact of these economic pressures on the quality and efficiency of health care, there have been few quantitative studies of the impact of managed care on the cost and utilization of health services.1-3 There have been only 2 prior studies2,3 on the impact of financial incentives for physicians on the general utilization and cost of health services, and both of those focused on plan payment method rather than compensation by the medical group to the individual physician. Moreover, a recent descriptive study of large medical groups in California4 suggested that placing medical groups at risk through health plan capitation might result in reduced utilization, but did not address individual physician compensation methods within those groups.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Growth of Medical Groups Paid through Capitation in CaliforniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Moral Hazard and Risk Spreading in PartnershipsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995
- Data analysis and sample size issues in evaluations of community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs: A mixed-model analysis of variance approachJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Development and Application of a Population-Oriented Measure of Ambulatory Care Case-MixMedical Care, 1991
- Compensation and Productive Efficiency in Partnerships: Evidence from Medical Groups PracticeJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- How Do Financial Incentives Affect Physicians' Clinical Decisions and the Financial Performance of Health Maintenance Organizations?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Analysis of Community-Based Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Studies—Evaluation Issues in the North Karelia Project and the Minnesota Heart Health ProgramInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Choosing the Correct Unit of Analysis in Medical Care ExperimentsMedical Care, 1984
- A Controlled Trial of the Effect of a Prepaid Group Practice on Use of ServicesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- A comparison of statistical methods for evaluating risk factor changes in community-based studies: An example from the Stanford Three-Community StudyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981