The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 49 (1) , 7-18
- https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.7
Abstract
The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results. A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present. This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability. The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeClinical Chemistry, 2003
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography Versus Duplex Sonography for Diagnosing Renovascular DiseaseHypertension, 1999
- Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trialCancer, 1998
- Limitations of Sensitivity, Specificity, Likelihood Ratio, and Bayesʼ Theorem in Assessing Diagnostic ProbabilitiesEpidemiology, 1997
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1994
- The value of aspiration cytologic examination of the breast a statistical review of the medical literatureCancer, 1992
- A model for assessing the sensitivity and specificity of tests subject to selection biasJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- The influence of uninterpretability on the assessment of diagnostic testsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: Groups, analysis and biasThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978