What Makes a Good Scientist?: Determinants of Peer Evaluation among Biologists
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Studies of Science
- Vol. 25 (1) , 35-55
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025001003
Abstract
This study explores the criteria by which biologists in the United States evaluate their peers' scientific performance. Six distinguished biology professors rated forty-two former National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellows on the basis of the latter's CVs and bibliographies. The most powerful predictor of these quality judgements was the rated scientist's annual productivity rate: this explained more than 40% of the variance in the evaluators' judgements.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: