ETS‐lung cancer epidemiology: Supportability of misclassification and risk assumptions
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Environmental Technology Letters
- Vol. 9 (6) , 479-490
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09593338809384595
Abstract
The NAS Committee on Passive Smoking used epidemiologic data to estimate the risk of lung cancer associated with ETS exposure. Mathematical models were used to assess the influence of smoking‐ and exposure‐status misclassification. These models and the database for their application are thoroughly examined. For smoking status misclassification, the model is technically sound; for exposure misclassification, the model is empirically logical, but mathematically can require very precise data. Further effort is necessary to compensate for the paucity of data to which the models can be applied.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer Association: A Result of Bias?Human Toxicology, 1987
- Misclassification of environmental tobacco smoke exposure: Its potential influence on studies of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancerToxicology Letters, 1987
- Mathematical modelling of nicotine and cotinine as biological markers of environmental tobacco smoke exposureToxicology Letters, 1987
- Does breathing other people's tobacco smoke cause lung cancer?BMJ, 1986
- VALIDATION OF STUDIES ON LUNG CANCER IN NON-SMOKERS MARRIED TO SMOKERSThe Lancet, 1984
- Prevalence and correlates of passive smoking.American Journal of Public Health, 1983
- Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan.BMJ, 1981