Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance
- 18 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Experimental Brain Research
- Vol. 158 (4) , 405-414
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1913-2
Abstract
It has repeatedly been demonstrated that the presence of multiple cues in different sensory modalities can enhance behavioral performance by speeding responses, increasing accuracy, and/or improving stimulus detection. Despite an extensive knowledge base as to how the spatial, temporal, and physical (e.g., intensity) characteristics of multisensory stimuli influence such enhancements, little is known about the role of semantic or contextual congruence. Our hypothesis was that semantically congruent multisensory stimuli would result in enhanced behavioral performance, and that semantically incongruent multisensory stimuli would result in either no enhancement or a decrement in behavioral performance. The results from a redundant cue feature discrimination task clearly demonstrate that congruent cross-modal stimulation improves behavioral performance. This effect is specific to the multisensory stimuli, as no improvements are seen in the presence of redundant unimodal stimulus pairs. In contrast, incongruent stimulus pairs result in behavioral decrements for both multisensory and paired unimodal stimuli. These results highlight that in addition to such simple stimulus features as space, time and relative effectiveness, the semantic content of a multisensory stimulus plays a critical role in determining how it is processed by the nervous system.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cross‐modal sensory processing in the anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal corticesHuman Brain Mapping, 2003
- Detection of Audio-Visual Integration Sites in Humans by Application of Electrophysiological Criteria to the BOLD EffectNeuroImage, 2001
- Processing linguistic and perceptual dimensions of speech: Interactions in speeded classification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1999
- Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus differencePerception & Psychophysics, 1995
- Visual-auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing: Saccades versus manual responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994
- Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference: A reply to Cowan and Barron (1987)Perception & Psychophysics, 1989
- The reality of cross-modal Stroop effectsPerception & Psychophysics, 1989
- Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference and possible implications for speech memoryPerception & Psychophysics, 1987
- Hearing lips and seeing voicesNature, 1976