Comparison of Empirical Peak Capacities for High-Efficiency Capillary Chromatographic Techniques

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Experimental peak capacities for capillary gas chromatography (GC), capillary liquid chromatography (CLC), and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) were compared. To obtain a meaningful comparison, the following constraints were applied. First, the same sample (mixture of alkylbenzenes) was used as a test mixture for all three techniques; second, the same packing material and column diameter were used in CLC and CEC; and third, isothermal conditions were used in GC, while isocratic conditions were used both in CLC and in CEC. Comparison of peak capacities for the same total column efficiency (∼36 000 plates) showed that the peak capacity of GC is greater than those of the liquid-phase separation techniques. Comparison of CEC and CLC for constant retention factor was also carried out. For this condition, the results depend on the particle size used; for 3-μm porous particles, CEC had a peak capacity larger than CLC due to higher efficiency from the flow profile generated by electroosmotic flow. However, when 1.5-μm nonporous particles were used, the peak capacities were approximately the same for both techniques. The effect of linear velocity on peak capacity was also studied for all three techniques. Practical conditions aimed at increasing peak capacities of liquid-phase separation techniques are discussed.