An Evaluation of Air–Sea Flux Products for ENSO Simulation and Prediction
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Monthly Weather Review
- Vol. 130 (3) , 723-732
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0723:aeoasf>2.0.co;2
Abstract
This paper presents a quantitative methodology for evaluating air–sea fluxes related to ENSO from different atmospheric products. A statistical model of the fluxes from each atmospheric product is coupled to an ocean general circulation model (GCM). Four different products are evaluated: reanalyses from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), satellite-derived data from the Special Sensor Microwave/Imaging (SSM/I) platform and the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP), and an atmospheric GCM developed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) as part of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) II. For this study, comparisons between the datasets are restricted to the dominant air–sea mode. The stability of a coupled model using only the dominant mode and the associated predictive skill of the model are strongly dependent on which atmospheric product is used. The model is ... Abstract This paper presents a quantitative methodology for evaluating air–sea fluxes related to ENSO from different atmospheric products. A statistical model of the fluxes from each atmospheric product is coupled to an ocean general circulation model (GCM). Four different products are evaluated: reanalyses from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), satellite-derived data from the Special Sensor Microwave/Imaging (SSM/I) platform and the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP), and an atmospheric GCM developed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) as part of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) II. For this study, comparisons between the datasets are restricted to the dominant air–sea mode. The stability of a coupled model using only the dominant mode and the associated predictive skill of the model are strongly dependent on which atmospheric product is used. The model is ...Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- ENSO’s Phase Locking to the Seasonal Cycle in the Fast-SST, Fast-Wave, and Mixed-Mode RegimesJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2000
- An Improved Coupled Model for ENSO Prediction and Implications for Ocean Initialization. Part I: The Ocean Data Assimilation SystemMonthly Weather Review, 1998
- An Improved Coupled Model for ENSO Prediction and Implications for Ocean Initialization. Part II: The Coupled ModelMonthly Weather Review, 1998
- The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis ProjectBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1996
- Interactions between the seasonal cycle and the Southern Oscillation ‐ Frequency entrainment and chaos in a coupled ocean‐atmosphere modelGeophysical Research Letters, 1994
- El Niño on the Devil's Staircase: Annual Subharmonic Steps to ChaosScience, 1994
- An Intercomparison of Methods for Finding Coupled Patterns in Climate DataJournal of Climate, 1992
- Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation Features of Warm and Cold Episodes in the Tropical PacificJournal of Climate, 1990
- Normal Monthly Wind Stress Over the World Ocean with Error EstimatesJournal of Physical Oceanography, 1983
- A Description of the GFDL Global Spectral ModelMonthly Weather Review, 1982