Critical Amino Acid Residues of the Common Allosteric Site on the M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor: More Similarities than Differences between the Structurally Divergent Agents Gallamine and Bis(ammonio)alkane-Type Hexamethylene-bis-[dimethyl-(3-phthalimidopropyl)ammonium]dibromide
Open Access
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Pharmacology
- Vol. 68 (3) , 769-778
- https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.105.014043
Abstract
The structurally divergent agents gallamine and hexamethylene-bis-[dimethyl-(3-phthalimidopropyl)ammonium]dibromide (W84) are known to interact competitively at a common allosteric site on muscarinic receptors. Previous studies reported that the M2 selectivity of gallamine depended largely on the EDGE (172-175) sequence in the second outer loop (o2) and on 419Asn near the junction of o3 and the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7), whereas the selectivity of W84 depended on nearby residues 177Tyr and 423Thr. However, it has so far proven difficult to confer the high sensitivity for allosteric modulation of the M2 subtype onto the weakly sensitive M5 subtype by substituting these key residues. We now have found that M2423Thr, not 419Asn, is the dominant residue in the o3/TM7 region for gallamine9s high potency, although 419Asn can substitute for 423Thr in some contexts; in contrast, the presence of 419Asn reduces the potency of W84 in every context we have studied. In addition, the orientation of 177Tyr is crucial to high sensitivity toward W84, and it seems that the proline residue at position 179 in M5 (corresponding to M2172Glu) may interfere with that orientation. Consistent with these observations, a mutant M5 receptor with these three key mutations, M5P179E, Q184Y, and H478T, showed dramatically increased sensitivity for W84 (>100-fold), compared with the wild-type M5 receptor. This same mutant receptor approached M2 sensitivity toward gallamine. Thus, gallamine and W84 derive high potency from the same receptor domains (epitopes in o2 and near the junction between o3 and TM7), even though these allosteric agents have quite different structures.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Asparagine, Valine, and Threonine in the Third Extracellular Loop of Muscarinic Receptor Have Essential Roles in the Positive Cooperativity of Strychnine-Like Allosteric ModulatorsThe Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2005
- Autoantibodies against M2-muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: new upstream targets in atrial fibrillation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathyEuropean Heart Journal, 2004
- Interactions of Orthosteric and Allosteric Ligands with [3H]Dimethyl-W84 at the Common Allosteric Site of Muscarinic M2 ReceptorsMolecular Pharmacology, 2003
- Allosteric Site on Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors: Identification of Two Amino Acids in the Muscarinic M2 Receptor That Account Entirely for the M2/M5 Subtype Selectivities of Some Structurally Diverse Allosteric Ligands in N-Methylscopolamine-Occupied ReceptorsMolecular Pharmacology, 2003
- G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and ComplexingPharmacological Reviews, 2002
- Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G Protein-Coupled ReceptorScience, 2000
- Constitutive Activation of the m5 Muscarinic Receptor by a Series of Mutations at the Extracellular End of Transmembrane 6Biochemistry, 1997
- Mutational Analysis of the Relative Orientation of Transmembrane Helices I and VII in G Protein-coupled ReceptorsPublished by Elsevier ,1995
- Allosteric regulation of cloned m1–m5 muscarinic receptor subtypesBiochemical Pharmacology, 1991
- Inhibition of the actions of carbachol and DFP on guinea pig isolated atria by alkane-bis-ammonium compoundsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1969