Planned vs emergent cesarean hysterectomy
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 197 (2) , 154.e1-154.e5
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.026
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Placenta Previa, Placenta Accreta, and Vasa PreviaObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Previous Cesarean Delivery and Risks of Placenta Previa and Placental AbruptionObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Abnormal placentation: Twenty-year analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- A National Estimate of the Elective Primary Cesarean Delivery RateObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Prenatal Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta and Percreta With Ultrasonography, Color Doppler, and Magnetic Resonance ImagingObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Is placenta accreta catching up with us?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Planned cesarean hysterectomy: A preferred alternative to separate operationsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999