The value of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations: Different results between indication‐based and screening‐based investigations

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The advantages of a routine screening or indication‐based ultrasound investigation during pregnancy are still under debate. This is the first study where both methods are compared in two different time periods. More malformations were diagnosed before the 24th week of gestation by means of screening‐based than indication‐based investigation (18 per cent vs. 5 per cent, PP<0·01). Twenty‐six per cent of all malformations were detected by means of screening‐based investigations as opposed to 15 per cent by means of indication‐based scans. Primary fetal malformations were also diagnosed much earlier (25 weeks vs. 30 weeks). Except for the fetal head, the detection rate of malformations was higher in nearly all other body regions of the fetus in the screening‐based investigation. The most important advantage of a screening‐based ultrasound investigation during pregnancy is to detect the malformations early enough in pregnancy for possible intrauterine treatment or to offer safe termination of pregnancy for the woman, at least for those anomalies that are lethal or significantly handicapping.