The prognostic significance of expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) in primary breast cancer
Open Access
- 1 August 1997
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 76 (4) , 486-493
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1997.414
Abstract
In the present study, we determined the frequency and intensity of MRP protein expression by monoclonal antibody immunohistochemistry in a series of 259 resected invasive primary breast carcinomas, and we evaluated MRP immunoreactivity in relation to patient and tumour characteristics, relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The immunostaining was graded on a semiquantitative scale that ranged from (-) to ( ). Overall, 34% of the tumours were positive for anti-MRP antibody: 19% showed weak cytoplasmic staining (+), 14% had clear cytoplasmic staining (++) and only 1% of the tumours had a strong cytoplasmic as well as membranous staining ( ). MRP expression was not related to patient's age, menopausal status, tumour size, differentiation grade, oestrogen and progesterone receptor level or lymph node involvement. In an exploratory univariate analysis of all patients, only primary tumour size and number of lymph nodes involved were significantly associated with shortened RFS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 respectively) and OS (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001 respectively). In Cox univariate analysis for RFS in subgroups of patients stratified by menopausal status, tumour size, nodal status, adjuvant systemic therapy and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status, MRP expression was associated with increased risk for failure in patients with small tumours (T1), in node-negative patients and in node-positive patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF); the relative hazard rate (RHR) for relapse was increased in the presence of MRP, with RHR values with 95% confidence limits (CL) of 2.8 (1.2-6.9), 2.1 (1.0-4.2) and 2.8 (0.8-9.9) respectively. In analysis for OS, expression of MRP was also associated with increased risk for failure in patients with small tumours (T1) [RHR (95% CL) 2.3 (0.9-6.0)] and in node-positive patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with CMF [RHR (95% CL) 3.7 (0.8-17.1)] but not in node-negative patients [RHR (95% CL) 1.1 (0.4-2.6)]. In conclusion, our results show that MRP is frequently overexpressed in primary breast cancer and suggest that MRP expression might be of prognostic significance in the subgroups of patients with the more favourable prognosis, i.e. patients with small tumours and node-negative patients, as well as in the setting of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. In primary breast cancer, MRP might be related to altered cell biological behaviour, including a more aggressive phenotype, and resistance to adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- MDR1 and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) gene expression in epithelial ovarian tumorsCancer Letters, 1996
- Expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) gene in primary non-small-cell lung cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1996
- Multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) in haematological malignanciesLeukemia & Lymphoma, 1996
- Expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) gene in human lung tumours and normal tissue as determined by in situ hybridisationEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- Deletion of gene for multidrug resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia with inversion in chromosome 16: prognostic implicationsThe Lancet, 1994
- Clinical relevance of P-glycoprotein expression in haematological malignanciesLeukemia Research, 1994
- Cell biological factors associated with the response of breast cancer to systemic treatmentCancer Treatment Reviews, 1993
- Overexpression of a Transporter Gene in a Multidrug-Resistant Human Lung Cancer Cell LineScience, 1992
- Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Prognostic Factors and Treatment Decisions in Axillary-Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992