Can a finite element method perform arbitrarily badly?
Open Access
- 24 February 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Mathematical Society (AMS) in Mathematics of Computation
- Vol. 69 (230) , 443-463
- https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-99-01085-6
Abstract
In this paper we construct elliptic boundary value problems whose standard finite element approximations converge arbitrarily slowly in the energy norm, and show that adaptive procedures cannot improve this slow convergence. We also show that the -norm and the nodal point errors converge arbitrarily slowly. With the -norm two cases need to be distinguished, and the usual duality principle does not characterize the error completely. The constructed elliptic problems are one dimensional.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some new error estimates for Ritz–Galerkin methods with minimal regularity assumptionsMathematics of Computation, 1996
- Thepandh-pVersions of the Finite Element Method, Basic Principles and PropertiesSIAM Review, 1994
- Special Finite Element Methods for a Class of Second Order Elliptic Problems with Rough CoefficientsSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1994
- Finite Element-Galerkin Approximation of the Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of Selfadjoint ProblemsMathematics of Computation, 1989
- A feedback finite element method with a posteriori error estimation: Part I. The finite element method and some basic properties of the a posteriori error estimatorComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1987
- n-Widths in Approximation TheoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Feedback and adaptive finite element solution of one-dimensional boundary value problemsNumerische Mathematik, 1984
- Saturation and Inverse Theorems for Spline ApproximationPublished by Springer Nature ,1973
- Ein Kriterium für die Quasi-Optimalität des Ritzschen VerfahrensNumerische Mathematik, 1968
- Theory of Approximation of Functions of a Real VariablePublished by Elsevier ,1963