Renovascular hypertension: quantitative renography as a screening test.
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 149 (1) , 287-291
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.149.1.6225146
Abstract
The accuracy and reliability of quantitative .gamma. camera renography in screening for functionally significant renovascular hypertension was investigated. Renal perfusion, total and relative renal function and parenchymal transit times were measured in 141 patients with recently diagnosed or severe hypertension. Renal angiography was performed in 13 of the 15 patients diagnosed as having evidence of renovascular hypertension. In all 13 either occlusion or significant stenosis of the renal artery was correctly predicted. Previous studies utilizing static images, playback buffers and renograms have shown that these methods have excellent sensitivity, but relatively low specificity because of false-positive results. The addition of computer quantitation, including measurement of parenchymal transit times, has greatly improved the accuracy of this test. Quantitative renography can now be regarded as a reliable means of selecting patients for transluminal dilatation of stenosed renal arteries and for follow-up after this procedure.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hypertensive urogram: a nondiscriminatory test for renovascular hypertensionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Balloon Dilatation for Renal Artery Stenosis Causing Hypertension: Criteria, Concerns, and CautionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980
- Renovascular Hypertension: The Ucla ExperienceJournal of Urology, 1979
- COMPUTER-ASSISTED STATIC-DYNAMIC RENAL IMAGING - SCREENING-TEST FOR RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION1979
- DYNAMIC RENAL-TRANSPLANT IMAGING WITH TC-99M DTPA (SN) SUPPLEMENTED BY A TRANSPLANT PERFUSION INDEX IN MANAGEMENT OF RENAL-TRANSPLANTS1978
- TC-99M-DTPA DYNAMIC RENAL SCAN WITH DECONVOLUTION ANALYSIS1976
- Renal artery stenosisPublished by Elsevier ,1964