origin and emplacement of ophiolites

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Ever since their recognition, ophiolites have been a source of controversy, although all workers have agreed upon their importance. A number of conflicting schools of thought have become unified in the interpretation of ophiolite complexes as fragments of oceanic crust and mantle formed at spreading centers. An expanded version of the Penrose ophiolite definition is proposed, herein called the ophiolite association, taking into account rocks which bear upon the origin and significance of ophiolite complexes. An ideal ophiolite association includes the following units from bottom to top: (1) a crystalline basement and shallow water sedimentary sequence, (2) a tectonic unit of thrust slices of continental margin and rise and abyssal sediments and/or melange, (3) a metamorphic unit, as much as a few hundred meters thick, generally with higher‐grade rocks over lower‐grade ones, (4) ultramafic tectonite unit composed dominantly of multiply deformed peridotite, dunite, and minor chromitite, (5) a cumulate complex, ultramafic at the base grading to mafic or intermediate at the top, (6) a noncumulus unit of varitextured gabbro and minor trondhjemite (7) a sheeted dike complex, (8) an extrusive section of massive and pillowed flows and intercalated sediments, (9) an abyssal or bathyal sediment sequence which may include radiolarian chert, red pelagic limestone, metalliferous sediments, breccias, and/or pyroclastic deposits, and (10) postemplacement deposits of laterite, reef limestone, or shallow marine or subaerial sediments. This expanded ophiolite association allows greater precision in inferring original origin and emplacement. Some ophiolite complexes, particularly in the Tethys (herein designated Tethyan type), exhibit units 1, 2, 3, and 4, whereas others, particularly in the Cordilleran belt (herein termed Cordilleran type), lack units 1, 2, 3, and, in places, 4. The emplacement of the former probably occurred during collision of a passive margin with a subduction zone or incipient subduction zone. Emplacement of the Cordilleran type generally is not clear‐cut. The nature of the spreading center which produced a given ophiolite is indicated more clearly by the presence or absence of units 5–9 than by chemistry or mineralogy. Some ophiolite complexes lack complete sections and may have formed along transform faults. Others contain volcanic pyroclastic deposits instead of pelagic sedimentary sequence and probably formed within or near an arc. Several ophiolite complexes may have originated by conversion of a transform fault into a subduction zone. Such conversion may result from normal plate evolution or from major plate reorganization. Major times of ophiolite emplacements appear to correspond with global plate reorganizations.