Toward a Two-Track Model of Leadership Training
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Small Group Research
- Vol. 21 (2) , 147-167
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496490212001
Abstract
The personality typology of high versus low self-monitoring is presented as a possible moderator of leadership training. The behavior of high self-monitoring individuals is guided by situational factors; these individuals are capable of accurate modifications of their behavior to correspond to social situations, and they are especially skilled in diagnosing social situations. Hence, high self-monitoring leaders should benefit most from leadership training requiring leaders'behavior to change as a function of group contingencies (Track I training). In contrast, the behavior of low self-monitoring individuals is displayed in accordance with internal, dispositional traits and values. These leaders should profit most from training that instructs leaders to alter organizational structures (relationships with boss or with the subordinate group) to produce an effective match between the leader's intrinsic behavioral style and group contingencies (Track I training).Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Group Members' Self-Monitoring as a Possible Neutralizer of LeadershipSmall Group Behavior, 1989
- Sex Differences in the Relationship Between Self-Monitoring and Leader BehaviorSmall Group Behavior, 1987
- Self-Monitoring and Performance in Nontraditional OccupationsBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1987
- Self-monitoring and Sex As Related to Assessment Center Rating and Job PerformanceBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1985
- Management of the mixed-cultural work groupOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983
- Self-monitoring and the attitude–behavior relation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- OD Techniques and Their Results in 23 Organizations: The Michigan ICL StudyThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973
- The Management Side of PERTCalifornia Management Review, 1962
- Achieving Change in People: Some Applications of Group Dynamics TheoryHuman Relations, 1951