Randomized COMparison of Platelet Inhibition With Abciximab, TiRofiban and Eptifibatide During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes
- 17 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 106 (12) , 1470-1476
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000029744.01096.1f
Abstract
Background— The relative anti-aggregatory effects of currently prescribed platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists during and after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes have not been established. Methods and Results— We randomized 70 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to receive abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban at doses used in the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for STENTing (EPISTENT), Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT), and Platelet Receptor Inhibition in ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and symptoms (PRISM-PLUS)/Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Restenosis (RESTORE) trials, respectively. Platelet aggregation (PA) in response to 20 μmol/L of adenosine diphosphate was measured with turbidimetric aggregometry in both D-phenylalanyl- l -prolyl- l -arginine chloromethylketone and citrate-anticoagulated blood early (15 and 30 minutes) and late (4, 12, and 18 to 24 hours) after drug initiation. At 15 and 30 minutes, PA was significantly less inhibited by the tirofiban-RESTORE regimen compared with abciximab ( P =0.028) and eptifibatide regimens ( P =0.0001). The abciximab regimen, however, showed increasingly varied anti-aggregatory effects during continued infusion for ≥4 hours. Citrate exaggerated ex vivo platelet inhibition after eptifibatide and tirofiban, but had the opposite effect on abciximab. Of all regimens evaluated, the eptifibatide regimen inhibited PA most consistently throughout both the early and late periods. Conclusions— Currently recommended drug regimens to inhibit the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor have distinct pharmacodynamic profiles that might affect their relative efficacy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Two Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors, Tirofiban and Abciximab, for the Prevention of Ischemic Events with Percutaneous Coronary RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Comparison of Early Invasive and Conservative Strategies in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes Treated with the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor TirofibanNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without early coronary revascularisation: the GUSTO IV-ACS randomised trialThe Lancet, 2001
- Timing of and risk factors for myocardial ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (IMPACT-II)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa InhibitorsArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 1999
- Complementary Clinical Benefits of Coronary-Artery Stenting and Blockade of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa ReceptorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Inhibition of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with Eptifibatide in Patients with Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Inhibition of the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor with Tirofiban in Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study of tirofiban (MK-383) platelet IIb/IIIa blockade in high risk patients undergoing coronary angioplastyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Use of a Monoclonal Antibody Directed against the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor in High-Risk Coronary AngioplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994