Comparison of the bis‐intercalating complexes formed between either ditercalinium or a flexible analogue and d(CpGpCpG)2 or d(TpTpCpGpCpGpApA)2 minihelices: 1H‐ and 31P‐nmr analyses

Abstract
The 400‐MHz 1H‐ and 162‐MHz 31F‐nmr have been used to study complexes constituted by (a) the d(TpTpCpGpCpGpApA)2 or the d(CpGpCpG)2 self‐complementary oligonucleotides and (b) two bifunctional 7H‐pyrido [4, 3‐c] carbazole dimer drugs, the antitumoral ditercalinium (NSC 366241), a dimer with a rigid bis‐piperidine linking chain and its pharmacologically inactive analogue, a dimer with a flexible spermine‐like linking chain. Nearly all proton and phosphorus signals have been assigned by two‐dimensional (2D) nmr (correlated spectroscopy, homonuclear Hartmann‐Hahn, nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy, 2D 31P {1H} heteronuclear correlated spectroscopy and 31P‐31P chemical exchange experiments). Both drugs bis‐intercalate into the two CpG sites. The complexes show small differences in the position of the 7H‐pyrido[4, 3‐c]carbazole ring into the intercalation site and possibly in the ribose‐phosphate backbone deformation. However, the inactive analogue exhibits a longer residence lifetime in octanucleotide than the ditercalinium does. All these results are discussed in terms of differences in dimer activities.