When can a clinical trial be called ‘randomized’?
- 17 January 2003
- Vol. 21 (5-6) , 468-472
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00475-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring clinical trialsBMJ, 2001
- Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-AnalysesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experimentsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Randomness as a ResourceAmerican Scientist, 2001
- Efficacy of Nurse Telehealth Care and Peer Support in Augmenting Treatment of Depression in Primary CareArchives of Family Medicine, 2000
- Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Understanding controlled trials: Randomisation methods: concealmentBMJ, 1999
- Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelinesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Reporting of assignment methods in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1994
- Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: A reviewStatistics in Medicine, 1985