Observations on coprophagy and the transmission ofHymenolepis nanainfections in mice
- 1 August 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Parasitology
- Vol. 73 (1) , 39-45
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000051301
Abstract
Summary: Young, previously uninfected white mice became infected withHymenolepis nanawhen exposed in small cages to parasite eggs which had been sprinkled in suspension onto the floor of their cage, or to faeces from mice with patent infections. The mean daily probabilities of infection for individual eggs under these two conditions were 2·9 × 10−6and 5·4 × 10−6respectively. If the mice were starved for 24 h prior to exposure to faeces, then the mean daily probability of infection increased to 2·6 × 10−4. These differences in transmission are interpreted as being due to differences in the extent of coprophagy; they are not due to any effect of starvation on the hatchability of eggs.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population dynamics ofHymenolepis nanain mice: fecundity and the ‘crowding effect’Parasitology, 1974
- The kinetics of repeated low-level infections of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in the laboratory ratParasitology, 1971
- Studies on Helminth ImmunityThe Journal of Immunology, 1962
- STUDIES ON HELMINTH IMMUNITY .4. RAPID ONSET OF RESISTANCE BY WHITE MOUSE AGAINST A CHALLENGING INFECTION WITH EGGS OF HYMENOLEPIS-NANA (CESTODA - HYMENOLEPIDIDAE)1962
- Prevention of Coprophagy in the RatJournal of Nutrition, 1957
- HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS OF HYMENOLEPIS FRATERNA IN THE RAT AND THE MOUSE*American Journal of Epidemiology, 1933