P300, Probability, and Interstimulus Interval
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psychophysiology
- Vol. 27 (4) , 396-403
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb02333.x
Abstract
The relationship between target stimulus probability and interstimulus interval on the P300 (P3) component of the event-related potential was assessed in three experiments. In each study an auditory discrimination paradigm was employed wherein subjects indicated with a finger tap response the occurrence of a randomly presented 2000 Hz target tone embedded in a series of 1000 Hz tones. Target stimuli were presented with a probability of either .20 or .80 in different conditions which were combined factorially with different interstimulus intervals. Experiment I presented stimuli at 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 second intervals; Experiment 2 presented stimuli at 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0 second intervals; Experiment 3 presented stimuli at 4.0, 6.0, or 10.0 second intervals. P3 amplitude was larger for the .20 relative to the .80 target probability conditions for the shorter interstimulus intervals but not for the longer intervals. P3 latency was consistently longer for the .20 relative to the .80 target probability conditions, with generally little effect observed for interstimulus interval changes. The results suggest that interstimulus interval affects component amplitude by determining the amount of processing resources available when the P3 is produced.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1988
- Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuliBiological Psychology, 1987
- Functional Differences Between Members of the P300 Complex: P3e and P3bPsychophysiology, 1987
- P300 and Recall in an Incidental Memory ParadigmPsychophysiology, 1986
- Processing of stimulus properties: Evidence for dual-task integrality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1985
- Processing of stimulus properties: Evidence for dual-task integrality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1985
- The Effects of Probability and Discriminability on the Evoked Potentials to Unpredictable StimuliaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1984
- Surprise!… Surprise?Psychophysiology, 1981
- Evoked potential correlates of human information processingBiological Psychology, 1979
- QUANTITATIVE EVOKED POTENTIAL CORRELATES OF THE PROBABILITY OF EVENTSPsychophysiology, 1970