Tirapazamine, Cisplatin, and Radiation Versus Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Radiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG 98.02)
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (1) , 79-87
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.072
Abstract
Purpose: To select one of two chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck as the experimental arm for the next Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group phase III trial. Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty-two previously untreated patients with stage III/IV SCC of the head and neck were randomized to receive definitive radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) concurrently with either cisplatin (75 mg/m2) plus tirapazamine (290 mg/m2/d) on day 2 of weeks 1, 4, and 7, and tirapazamine alone (160 mg/m2/d) on days 1, 3, and 5 of weeks 2 and 3 (TPZ/CIS), or cisplatin (50 mg/m2) on day 1 and infusional fluorouracil (360 mg/m2/d) on days 1 through 5 of weeks 6 and 7 (chemoboost). Results: Three-year failure-free survival rates were 55% with TPZ/CIS (95% CI, 39% to 70%) and 44% with chemoboost (95% CI, 30% to 60%; log-rank P = .16). Three-year locoregional failure-free rates were 84% in the TPZ/CIS arm (95% CI, 71% to 92%) and 66% in the chemoboost arm (95% CI, 51% to 79%; P = .069). More febrile neutropenia and grade 3 or 4 late mucous membrane toxicity were observed with TPZ/CIS, while acute skin radiation reaction was more severe and prolonged with chemoboost. Compliance with protocol treatment was satisfactory on both arms. Conclusion: Both regimens are feasible and are associated with significant but acceptable toxicity profiles in the cooperative group setting. Based on the promising efficacy seen in this trial, TPZ/CIS is being evaluated in a large phase III trial.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concurrent Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Organ Preservation in Advanced Laryngeal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- An Intergroup Phase III Comparison of Standard Radiation Therapy and Two Schedules of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Squamous Cell Head and Neck CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- A radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) phase III randomized study to compare hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractionation to standard fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: first report of RTOG 9003Published by Elsevier ,2000
- Randomized Trial of Radiation Therapy Versus Concomitant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Advanced-Stage Oropharynx CarcinomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Phase I/II Trial of Radiation With Chemotherapy “Boost” for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: Toxicities and ResponsesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Hyperfractionated Irradiation with or without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Simultaneous radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized multicenter study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Radiation therapy alone or with concurrent low-dose daily either cisplatin or carboplatin in locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a prospective randomized trialRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1997
- Concomitant boost radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of carcinoma of the oropharynx and nasopharynxInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1990
- Accelerated Fractionation in the Radiation Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer—A Critical Comparison of Different StrategiesActa Oncologica, 1988