Atomism and Eschatology: Catholicism and Natural Philosophy in the Interregnum
- 1 November 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The British Journal for the History of Science
- Vol. 15 (3) , 211-239
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087400019336
Abstract
In spite of vigorous opposition by a number of historians it has now become a commonplace that the rapid development of the ‘new philosophy’ sprang from the ideology of Puritanism. What began its career as the ‘Merton thesis’ has now been refined, developed, and so often repeated that it seems to be almost unassailable. However, the two foremost historians in the entrenchment of this new orthodoxy are willing, in principle, to concede that ‘in reality things were very mixed up’, and that non-Puritan natural philosophers at the time were operating ‘in a precisely similar manner’ to their Puritan contemporaries. Indeed, it would be impossible not to concede this in the face of the many critiques launched against the Merton thesis.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- THOMAS WHITE'S GROUNDS OF OBEDIENCE AND GOVERNMENT : A NOTE ON THE DATING OF THE FIRST EDITIONNotes and Queries, 1981
- Puritans and English Science: A Critique of WebsterIsis, 1980
- The Anglican Origins of Modern Science: The Metaphysical Foundations of the Whig ConstitutionIsis, 1980
- THOMAS WHITE (OR BLACKLO),1593–1676: NEW DATANotes and Queries, 1973
- Towards a Reassessment of Renaissance AristotelianismHistory of Science, 1973
- Puritanism, Arminianism and Counter-RevolutionPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1973
- Studies in the Natural Philosophy of Sir Kenelm DigbyAmbix, 1971
- Godly RulePublished by Springer Nature ,1969
- Paracelsus and the Puritan RevolutionAmbix, 1963
- The Problem of Certainty in English Thought 1630–1690Published by Springer Nature ,1963