Comparison of Early versus Late Use of Antibiotic Locks in the Treatment of Catheter-Related Bacteremia

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background and objectives: This retrospective study compared the effectiveness of the timing of the antibiotic locks to clear catheter-related bacteremia in children on chronic hemodialysis. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: The early antibiotic lock group received antibiotic locks along with systemic antibiotics from the very beginning of catheter-related bacteremia. The late antibiotic lock group was given only systemic antibiotics initially, and antibiotic locks were used late in the infection if the catheter-related bacteremia could not be cleared after resolution of symptoms. Results: There were 264 catheter-related bacteremias in 79 children during 6 yr of observation. Early antibiotic locks were able to clear catheter-related bacteremia and resolve the symptoms more effectively without the need for catheter exchange when compared with late antibiotic locks. A total of 84 catheter-related bacteremias required wire-guided exchange of the catheters. Late antibiotic locks required wire-guided catheter exchange more frequently than the early antibiotic locks. The post–catheter-related bacteremia infection–free survival of the catheters after wire-guided exchange were significantly longer than those of both antibiotic lock groups. Recurrence of catheter-related bacteremia within 45 d after wire-guided exchange occurred at similar rates compared with the antibiotic lock groups. Conclusion: Antibiotic locks are significantly more effective in clearing catheter-related bacteremia when used early in infection, diminishing the need for catheter exchange. Wire-guided exchange has a late-onset advantage for infection-free survival compared with catheter in situ treatment. The recurrence rates in the first 45 d after catheter-related bacteremia are similar regardless of the treatment strategy.