The “gene dosage effect” hypothesis versus the “amplified developmental instability” hypothesis in Down syndrome
- 1 January 1999
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular analysis of chromosome 21 in a patient with a phenotype of down syndrome and apparently normal karyotypeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1996
- Behavioral assessment of the Ts65Dn mouse, a model for down syndrome: Altered behavior in the elevated plus maze and open fieldBehavior Genetics, 1996
- A behavioral assessment of Ts65Dn mice: a putative Down syndrome modelNeuroscience Letters, 1995
- Electrical membrane properties of cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons from trisomy 19 mouse fetuses: a comparison with the trisomy 16 mouse fetus, a model for Down syndromeBrain Research, 1990
- Congenital cardiovascular malformations associated with chromosome abnormalities: An epidemiologic studyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1989
- Skeletal anomalies in trisomy 21 as an example of amplified developmental instability in chromosome disorders: Histological study of the feet of 21 mid‐trimester fetuses with trisomy 21American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1988
- Specificity versus nonspecificity in the pathogenesis of aneuploid phenotypesAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1988
- The Consequences of Chromosome ImbalancePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- Comparative anatomical analysis of human trisomies 13, 18, and 21: I. The forelimbTeratology, 1986
- Fluctuating dental asymmetry: A measure of developmental instability in Down syndromeAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1980