Dual role of macrophages in the suppression of interleukin 2 production and interleukin 2 receptor expression in trypanosome‐infected mice
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 19 (5) , 829-835
- https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830190508
Abstract
Lymph node cells derived from T. brucei‐infected mice fail to produce interleukin 2 (IL 2) subsequent to a potent mitogenic trigger and actively suppress the capacity of normal cells to produce IL 2 in co‐culture experiments. The depletion of Thy‐1+ cells does not decrease but rather increases the suppressive potential of the LNC derived from infected mice. A T cell‐enriched nylon wool‐nonadherent fraction, on the other hand, is not suppressive. The suppression of IL 2 production is promptly restored by the addition of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors suggesting a key role of the prostaglandin‐producing macrophages. Our data indicate that such macrophages do not act indirectly through the induction of suppressor T cells, but rather directly interfere with the normal lymph node cells.In contrast to the essential role of prostaglandins in the impairment of IL 2 production, these mediators are not involved in the suppression of IL 2 receptor expression. Lymph node cells derived from Trypanosoma brucei‐infected mice fail to produce interleukin 2 (IL 2) subsequent to a potent mitogenic trigger and actively suppress the capacity of normal cells to produce IL 2 in co‐culture experiments. The depletion of Thy‐1+ cells does not decrease but rather increases the suppressive potential of the LNC derived from infected mice. A T cell‐enriched nylon wool‐nonadherent fraction, on the other hand, is not suppressive. The suppression of IL 2 production is promptly restored by the addition of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors suggesting a key role of the prostaglandin‐producing macrophages. Our data indicate that such macrophages do not act indirectly through the induction of suppressor T cells, but rather interfere directly with the normal lymph node cells.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Different mechanisms account for the suppression of interleukin 2 production and the suppression of interleukin 2 receptor expression in Trypanosoma brucei‐infected miceEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1989
- Experimental Trypanosoma brucei infections selectively suppress both interleukin 2 production and interleukin 2 receptor expressionEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1987
- Active suppression of interleukin 2 secretion in mice infected with Trypanosoma brucei AnTat 1.1. EParasite Immunology, 1986
- Monocyte receptors for fibronectin characterized by a monoclonal antibody that interferes with receptor activity.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1985
- T lymphocyte function during experimental Chagas' disease: production of and response to interleukin 2European Journal of Immunology, 1985
- Mac‐1: a macrophage differentiation antigen identified by monoclonal antibodyEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1979
- Immune depression in trypanosome‐infected mice. III. Suppressor cellsEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1979
- Immune depression in trypanosome‐infected mice I. Depressed T lymphocyte responsesEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1978
- Suppressor cells in experimental trypanosomiasisNature, 1977
- A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus‐derived murine lymphocytesEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1973