A Randomized Trial Comparing Peak Expiratory Flow and Symptom Self-management Plans for Patients with Asthma Attending a Primary Care Clinic
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 157 (2) , 540-546
- https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.9703060
Abstract
Great emphasis is placed on educating asthmatics to use action plans to achieve better control of symptoms. The use of peak flow meters (PFM) has been recommended as an important part of self- management plans. We studied 92 (47 F) adult patients with asthma in a primary care setting to compare the effectiveness of action plans using either peak flow monitoring or symptoms to guide self-management. Each patient was instructed in the use of the action plan in the context of a 6-mo asthma education program taught by a nurse. Patients were already using inhaled corticosteroids or were newly prescribed corticosteroids by their family physician. Forty-four patients were randomized to the PFM group and 48 to the symptoms group. Spirometry, symptom scores, quality of life, medi- cation use, and measures of health care utilization and morbidity (emergency department visits, hos- pitalizations, unscheduled doctor visits, and days lost from work or school) were recorded at baseline and throughout the study period. PC 20 methacholine was measured at the first and at the final visits. There were significant improvements within groups for FEV 1 , symptoms score, PC 20 methacholine, and quality of life, but no between-group differences. A significant shift from higher to lower daily use of b -agonists (p , 0.008 for both groups) and significant shifts to higher daily doses of inhaled steroids (p , 0.001) occurred in each group. Adherence to the self-management plans was only 65% in the PFM group and 52% in the symptoms group. Outcomes for health care utilization were similar except for fewer patients making unscheduled doctor visits within the PFM group. Our findings show that education, regular follow-up, and an action plan are effective in improving asthma control and quality of life, but the routine use of PFM to guide interventions is not the only way to accomplish these objectives. Turner MO, Taylor D, Bennett R, FitzGerald JM. A randomized trial compar- ing peak expiratory flow and symptom self-management plans for patients with asthma at- tending a primary care clinic . AM J RESPIR CRIT CARE MED 1998;157:540-546.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Compliance with and accuracy of daily self-assessment of peak expiratory flows (PEF) in asthmatic subjects over a three month periodEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1996
- Use of peak flow-based self-management plans by adult asthmatic patientsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1996
- Peak expiratory flow meters (PEFMs) – who uses them and how and does education affect the pattern of utilisation?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Guidelines on the management of asthma. Statement by the British Thoracic Society, the Brit. Paediatric Association, the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians of London, the King's Fund Centre, the National Asthma Campaign, the Royal College of General Practitioners, the General Practitioners in Asthma Group, the Brit. Assoc. of Accident and Emergency Medicine, and the Brit. Paediatric Respiratory Group.Thorax, 1993
- A research method to induce and examine a mild exacerbation of asthma by withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroidClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1992
- Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.Thorax, 1992
- Characteristics of attenders and non-attenders at an asthma education programme.Thorax, 1991
- Evaluation of peak flow and symptoms only self management plans for control of asthma in general practice.BMJ, 1990
- Review Article: Asthma Self-Management Programs: Premises, Not PromisesJournal of Asthma, 1988
- A Note on the Equivalence of Two Test Criteria for Hypotheses in Categorical DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1966