Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Renal Surgery: Comparisons, Combinations and Conclusions
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 58 (1) , 1-5
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1986.tb05416.x
Abstract
Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) were introduced clinically at approximately the same time (1980-1981), their clinical progress appeared to progress along separate paths and to compete with each other. After 5 years it has become apparent that for optimal removal of nearly all renal stones by minimal or non-invasive techniques, PCNL and ESWL are required either separately or as combined procedures. This review traces the development, introduction and progress of these procedures and defines the current indications for extracorporeal, percutaneous and open renal stone surgery.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abstracts of the Proceedings of the Urological Society of Australasia, 38th Annual Scientific Meeting, Adelaide, Australia, 1985British Journal of Urology, 1986
- Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract stonesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Percutaneous Nephrolithgtripsy: A Functional and Morphological StudyJournal of Urology, 1985
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL): alternatives and adjuvant proceduresWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endourology: an ideal combination for the treatment of kidney stonesWorld Journal of Urology, 1985
- Late Sequelae of Ultrasonic Lithotripsy of Renal CalculiJournal of Urology, 1985
- EndourologyJournal of Urology, 1984
- Shock Wave Treatment for Stones in the Upper Urinary TractUrologic Clinics of North America, 1983
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.BMJ, 1981
- Percutaneous Stone ManipulationJournal of Urology, 1981