Should We Stop Using Theophylline for the Treatment of the Hospitalized Patient with Status Asthmaticus?
- 5 December 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in DICP
- Vol. 23 (12) , 995-998
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106002808902301209
Abstract
Recent reviews and editorials have indicated that theophylline may not be effective for the therapy of acute severe asthma. This judgment is primarily based on data comparing the efficacy of theophylline to inhaled beta2-agonists in the emergency room treatment of asthma. The authors believe that it is inappropriate to extrapolate data from short-term studies in the emergency room setting to the hospitalized patients with status asthmaticus. Studies of hospitalized patients in which the patients were monitored for at least 24 hours all demonstrate a positive therapeutic effect for theophylline. The possible reasons for the discrepancies between hospitalized patients and emergency room patients are discussed. Theophylline is still recommended for the management of the hospitalized patient with status asthmaticus.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methylxanthines in 1989Annals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- Theophylline—How much is enough?Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1986
- Status AsthmaticusChest, 1985
- Individualizing Theophylline TherapyTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1983
- Emergency room treatment of asthmaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Comparative effect of epinephrine and aminophylline in the treatment of asthmaLung, 1981
- INFLUENCE OF TRACHEAL CONTRACTION ON RELAXANT EFFECTS in vitro OF THEOPHYLLINE AND ISOPRENALINEBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1981
- Cardiovascular response during severe acute asthma and its treatment in children.Thorax, 1981
- Aminophylline, salbutamol and combined intravenous infusions in acute severe asthmaRespiratory Medicine, 1980
- Comparison of intravenous aminophylline and salbutamol in severe asthma.BMJ, 1977