Probing Supersymmetry-InducedViolation atFactories
- 19 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 83 (3) , 488-491
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.488
Abstract
In the minimal supersymmetric standard model, the parameter and the trilinear coupling may be generically complex and can affect various observables at factories. Imposing the electric dipole moment constraints, we find that there is no new large phase shift in the mixing, violating dilepton asymmetry is smaller than , and the direct violation in can be as large as .
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electric dipole moments do not require theCP-violating phases of supersymmetry to be smallPhysical Review D, 1999
- Neutron and lepton electric dipole moments in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, largeviolating phases, and the cancellation mechanismPhysical Review D, 1998
- Supersymmetric Electroweak Phase Transition: Baryogenesis versus Experimental ConstraintsPhysical Review Letters, 1998
- Electroweak baryogenesis and Higgs and stop searches at LEP and the TevatronNuclear Physics B, 1998
- The chromoelectric and purely gluonic operator contributions to the neutron electric dipole moment in N=1 supergravityPhysics Letters B, 1998
- Supersymmetric electroweak baryogenesis in the WKB approximationPhysics Letters B, 1998
- Neutron and electron electric dipole moment insupergravity unificationPhysical Review D, 1998
- Supersymmetric Baryogenesis and Flavor PhysicsPhysical Review Letters, 1997
- The more Minimal Supersymmetric Standard ModelPhysics Letters B, 1996
- The electric dipole moment of the electronReviews of Modern Physics, 1991