Misreporting in rural fertility data: an analysis of husband–wife disagreement
- 1 October 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Biosocial Science
- Vol. 10 (4) , 437-444
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932000011937
Abstract
Summary: Two independent, concurrent demographic surveys in rural India, one male, the other female, were used to examine misreporting of ever-born children among 223 couples common to both samples. Husband-wife disagreements were checked in detail and characteristics of the errors and of the misreporters themselves were analysed. ‘Forgetting’ of dead children was the main cause of mistaken reporting. Another type of error was found to be sex-related: men, but not women, confused fetal deaths with live births. Of the various correlates of male misreporting tested, only age appeared to be a determining factor. On the other hand, traditional attitudes and overall response reliability were more important than age in explaining female errors. No significant relationships between faulty reporting and socio-economic status or family size were established. Various suggestions are made for minimizing fertility misreporting in surveys of rural, illiterate populations.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The repeatability of data obtained in a fertility surveyJournal of Biosocial Science, 1975
- A comparison of results obtained by men and women interviewers in a fertility surveyJournal of Biosocial Science, 1974
- The Khanna StudyPublished by Harvard University Press ,1971
- Family Planning in TaiwanPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1969
- CHAPTER 2. Characteristics of African Demographic DataPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1968
- Demography of Tropical AfricaPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1968