A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcome of Severely Injured Patients Treated in Trauma Centers Following the Establishment of Trauma Systems
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 60 (2) , 371-378
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb
Abstract
The establishment of trauma systems was anticipated to improve overall survival for the severely injured patient. We systematically reviewed the published literature to assess if outcome from severe traumatic injury is improved for patients following the establishment of a trauma system. A systematic literature review of all population-based studies that evaluated trauma system performance was conducted. A qualitative analysis of each study's design and methodology and a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the evidence to date of trauma system effectiveness. A search of the literature yielded 14 published articles. Trauma systems demonstrated improved odds of survival in 8 of the 14 reports. The overall quality-weighted odds ratio was 0.85 lower mortality following trauma system implementation. The results of the meta-analysis showed a 15% reduction in mortality in favor of the presence of a trauma system. Evaluation of trauma system effectiveness must remain an uncompromising commitment to optimal outcome for the injured patient.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Independently Derived Survival Risk Ratios Yield Better Estimates of Survival than Traditional Survival Risk Ratios When Using the ICISSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2003
- A Fresh Set of Survival Risk Ratios Derived from Incidents in the National Trauma Data Bank from which the ICISS May Be CalculatedPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2003
- TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centersJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Trauma Center MaturationAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- The ICD-9-Based Illness Severity ScoreThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Improved Predictions from A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1996
- Uses and Abuses of Statistical Models for Evaluating Trauma CareThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995
- Oregon Trauma System: Change in Initial Admission Site and Post‐admission Transfer of Injured PatientsAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1994
- The Major Trauma Outcome StudyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1990