Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing–selfing paradigm and beyond
- 29 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 358 (1434) , 991-1004
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1301
Abstract
Comparisons of the causes and consequences of cross– and self–fertilization have dominated research on plant mating since Darwin's seminal work on plant reproduction. Here, I provide examples of these accomplishments, but also illustrate new approaches that emphasize the role of floral design and display in pollen dispersal and fitness gain through male function. Wide variation in outcrossing rate characterizes animal–pollinated plants. In species with large floral displays, part of the selfing component of mixed mating can arise from geitonogamy and be maladaptive because of strong inbreeding depression and pollen discounting. Floral strategies that separate the benefits of floral display from the mating costs associated with geitonogamy can resolve these conflicts by reducing lost mating opportunities through male function. The results from experiments with marker genes and floral manipulations provide evidence for the function of herkogamy and dichogamy in reducing self–pollination and promoting pollen dispersal. Evidence is also presented indicating that increased selfing resulting from changes to floral design, or geitonogamy in large clones, can act as a stimulus for the evolution of dioecy. The scope of future research on mating strategies needs to be broadened to include investigations of functional links among flowers, inflorescences and plant architecture within the framework of life–history evolution.Keywords
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Theoretical Investigation of the Evolution and Maintenance of Mirror‐Image FlowersThe American Naturalist, 2003
- Evidence of gynodioecy and sex ratio variation in Wurmbea biglandulosa (Colchicaceae)Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 2002
- The evolution of self-fertilization in density-regulated populationsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- Why is cleistogamy a selected reproductive strategy in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae)?Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2002
- Packaging and provisioning in plant reproductionPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1996
- Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant speciesPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1996
- Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfingTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1993
- Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. II. The Selection of Self- FertilizationInternational Journal of Plant Sciences, 1992
- A note on the relationship between outcrossing rate and gene flow in plantsHeredity, 1988
- The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms I. DichogamyNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1986