Naiveté and an aquatic–terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Vol. 21 (12) , 674-680
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- TROUT PREDATORS AND DEMOGRAPHIC SOURCES AND SINKS IN A MAYFLY METAPOPULATIONEcology, 2005
- Interaction and impacts of two introduced species on a soft-sediment marine assemblage in SE TasmaniaMarine Biology, 2003
- Variability in the impact of an introduced predator (Asterias amurensis: Asteroidea) on soft-sediment assemblagesJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2003
- The role of introduced mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in excluding the native green and golden bell frog (Litoria aurea) from original habitats in south-eastern AustraliaOecologia, 2002
- Predatory impact of the freshwater invaderDikerogammarus villosus(Crustacea: Amphipoda)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2002
- Olfactory predator recognition: wallabies may have to learn to be waryAnimal Conservation, 2002
- A review of terrestrial mammalian and reptilian carnivore ecology in Australian fossil faunas, and factors influencing their diversity: the myth of reptilian domination and its broader ramificationsAustralian Journal of Zoology, 2002
- RESISTANCE AND RESILIENCE OF ALPINE LAKE FAUNA TO FISH INTRODUCTIONSEcological Monographs, 2001
- Responses of Australian Bush Rats, Rattus fuscipes, to the Odor of Introduced Vulpes vulpesJournal of Mammalogy, 1998
- Enhydra lutrisMammalian Species, 1980