Wavelength discrimination with a chromatically alternating stimulus
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Color Research & Application
- Vol. 10 (4) , 204-209
- https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080100408
Abstract
Wavelength‐discrimination functions were measured with monochromatic stimuli of 410–660 nm at equal luminance of 220 td, presented as temporally alternating fields at the frequencies of 0.5–12.0 Hz. When the alternation frequency was less than 1.0 Hz, wavelength discrimination was the same at all test wavelengths as that obtained by the classical bipartite‐field method. As the frequency was raised, the discrimination thresholds increased more near 450–470 nm than at other wavelengths, and tritanopic‐like wavelength‐discrimination functions were obtained at frequencies higher than 4.0 Hz. Our results may be explained by the notion that the blue‐cone mechanism has poorer temporal resolution than the red‐and green‐cone mechanisms.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Purity discrimination: Successive vs simultaneous comparison methodVision Research, 1982
- Color‐discrimination perimetryColor Research & Application, 1982
- Temporal deterioration of wavelength discrimination with successive comparison methodVision Research, 1981
- Luminous efficiency functions determined by successive brightness matchingJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1978
- Saturation of spectral lights*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1976
- Some dynamic features of colour visionVision Research, 1971
- Small-field Tritanopia and the Effects of Voluntary FixationOptica Acta: International Journal of Optics, 1960
- Wavelength Discrimination for Point SourcesJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1958
- Hue-discrimination in para-central parts of the human retina measured at different luminance levelsThe Journal of Physiology, 1951
- Hue-discrimination in normal colour-visionProceedings of the Physical Society, 1934