The Effects of Correlation and Response Bias in Alerted Monitor Displays
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 39 (4) , 570-580
- https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778667960
Abstract
We performed an experiment in which a human, working in conjunction with an automated signal detection device, monitored a system for abnormal states. The human and the automated alarm monitored sets of information that were either dependent, partially independent, or independent of each other. The response criteria of the alarm and human were manipulated. The participants concurrently performed either an easy Or difficult tracking task as a load task. The results indicate that system sensitivity decreases as the sets of information become increasingly dependent on each other. The benefits of the alarm did not always outweigh its costs, especially in the more dependent conditions, which are probably more characteristic of real-life situations.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- System operator response to warnings of danger: A laboratory investigation of the effects of the predictive value of a warning on human response time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1995
- Likelihood Alarm DisplaysHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1988
- On the Performance of a Combination of DetectorsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1964
- Formulas for the Coefficient of Interaural Correlation for NoiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1962