A Double-Blind Comparison of Meptazinol versus Distalgesic in Acute or Chronic Pain Presenting to the General Practitioner
- 1 March 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of International Medical Research
- Vol. 10 (2) , 104-108
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030006058201000206
Abstract
The results of treating acute or chronic pain with Distalgesic were compared in a double-blind fashion with the new partial antagonist analgesic meptazinol. Both drugs had similar analgesic time effect profiles and both were acceptable to doctor and patients. However the side-effect profile was better for meptazinol than Distalgesic and so meptazinol may be a useful alternative to Distalgesic in the treatment of everyday pain states.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- First Impressions of the Use of Meptazinol in General PracticeJournal of International Medical Research, 1981
- PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE OF THE USE OF MEPTAZINOL AS AN OBSTETRIC ANALGESICBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980
- A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF MEPTAZINOL WITH PETHIDINE IN POSTOPERATIVE PAINBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1980
- A COMPARISON OF THE RESPIRATORY EFFECTS OF MEPTAZINAOL PENTAZOCINE AND MORPHINEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1979
- Federal Government Faces Painful Decision on DarvonScience, 1979
- MEPTAZINOL AFTER OPEN-HEART SURGERYBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1978
- ANALGESIA AFTER OPERATION: A controlled comparison of meptazinol, pentazocine and pethidineBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1977
- THE OPIATE RECEPTOR AND OPIOID PEPTIDESJournal of Neurochemistry, 1977
- STUDIES ON HUMAN ADDICTION LIABILITY OF 2]-HYDROXY-5,9-DIMETHYL-2-(3,3-DIMETHYLALLYL)-6,7-BENZOMORPHAN ) WIN 20,228 ) - WEAK NARCOTIC ANTAGONIST1964
- THE ANALGESIC EFFECTIVENESS OF NALORPHINE AND NALORPHINE-MORPHINE COMBINATIONS IN MAN1954