Efficacy of combination therapy with artesunate plus amodiaquine compared to monotherapy with chloroquine, amodiaquine or sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum in Afghanistan
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Vol. 10 (6) , 521-529
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01429.x
Abstract
In South and Central Asia resistance to chloroquine (CQ) has reached unmanageable levels, and resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is emerging. Amodiaquine (AQ) is widely used in the region, and elsewhere shows only partial resistance to CQ. In Afghanistan, one option for slowing the spread of resistance and improving treatment outcomes is the use of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). The efficacy of CQ, AQ, SP and amodiaquine plus artesunate (AQ/AS) in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria was investigated using standard World Health Organization (WHO) procedures. Malaria patients were randomized to four treatment groups: 268 were enrolled and 240 completed the trial. There was a high level of cross-resistance between CQ and AQ resistance: adequate clinical and parasitological response by day 42 was 11% after CQ treatment and 9% after AQ treatment. The trend of treatment failure between AQ and CQ was almost identical. Cure rates were considerably improved by the addition of artesunate to AQ or by use of SP; adequate clinical and parasitological response being 72% for AQ/AS and 92% for SP. The combination of AS/AQ substantially reduced the odds of treatment failure relative to AQ monotherapy by day 42 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.1] in addition to reducing the proportion of patients with gametocytes throughout the 42-day period. Gametocyte carriage rate was only marginally higher in the SP than in the CQ- and AQ-treated groups. The therapeutic and parasitological cure rates with AS/AQ were inadequate, and the criteria for deploying ACT - namely to prevent further selection of drug resistance from a position of low frequency - was not met in the region. An alternative drug combination to AQ/AS is required for Afghanistan.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHO, the Global Fund, and medical malpractice in malaria treatmentThe Lancet, 2004
- Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2004
- Polymorphism in the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine-resistance transporter protein links verapamil enhancement of chloroquine sensitivity with the clinical efficacy of amodiaquineMalaria Journal, 2003
- A health facility based case–control study of effectiveness of insecticide treated nets: potential for selection bias due to pre‐treatment with chloroquineTropical Medicine & International Health, 2003
- Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum malaria to chloroquine is widespread in eastern AfghanistanPathogens and Global Health, 2001
- Chloroquine resistance in Pakistan and the upsurge of falciparum malaria in Pakistani and Afghan refugee populationsPathogens and Global Health, 1997
- Systematic review of amodiaquine treatment in uncomplicated malariaThe Lancet, 1996
- Malaria in Afghan refugees in PakistanTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1988
- Amodiaquine fails to cure chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum in the PunjabTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1987