Functional truth or sexist distortion?
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journalism
- Vol. 6 (1) , 43-65
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905048952
Abstract
Journalism assumes reporters are able to pursue ‘functional truth’ - an account of issues and events reliably describing social reality. But researchers have often found systematic bias. In reporting about cross-gender violence, critical feminist scholars contend that news media devalue violence against women and often blame the victim while mitigating or blurring the perpetrator’s responsibility. The present study is the first in the USA to test this critique as it applies to reporting the vast social pathology of intimate-partner violence. Consistent with the critique, intimate violence was covered much less often and with less depth than other violence of similar gravity. In contrast, however, the newspapers studied very rarely blamed female battering victims or mitigated suspect blame.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- News Portrayal of Violence and WomenAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 2003
- Multistate analysis of factors associated with intimate partner violenceAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002
- Framing Public LifePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2001
- Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysisJournal of Applied Communication Research, 1999
- News Coverage of Violence against Women: Engendering BlamePublished by SAGE Publications ,1997
- The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content AnalysisJournalism Quarterly, 1993
- Woman as Sign in Television NewsJournal of Communication, 1991
- Do abused children become abusive parents?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Journalism in the “post‐factual age”Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1987
- Placing the Blame for crime in press reportsDeviant Behavior, 1987