Enterorectal and Colorectal Anastomosis
- 1 July 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 116 (7) , 921-925
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380190051011
Abstract
• One-stage rectal anastomoses performed in 235 patients by one surgeon were studied. Of numerous techniques used to reduce anastomotic leakage, active suction drainage to remove presacral-space fluid accumulation was the most effective. Leakage developed in 11 (6.9%) of 160 patients whose conditions were managed without suction drainage or transverse or descending colon tube colostomy. In only one (1.1%) of 89 patients treated by one or both modalities did a leak develop. Seventy-two patients receiving suction drainage or both modalities had no leakage. Recorded suction drainage amounts and absence of leakage in these 72 patients support the contention that infected presacral accumulations of fluid are the most important cause of postoperative anastomotic dehiscence after rectal anastomosis. In 71 patients receiving tube colostomy, the tube site closed spontaneously following tube removal. No deaths from leakage occurred in either group. (Arch Surg1981;116:921-925)This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Closure of colostomy—A safe procedure?Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1977
- COLLAGEN-METABOLISM IN INFECTED COLONIC ANASTOMOSES1976
- Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomosesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1973
- Closure of colostomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1971
- Pelvic Drainage After Anterior Resection of the RectumArchives of Surgery, 1969
- Complications of Colonic SurgerySurgical Clinics of North America, 1967
- Carcinoma of Rectum and Low SigmoidArchives of Surgery, 1965
- Surgical treatment of diverticulitis of the sigmoidThe American Journal of Surgery, 1960
- Resection and Primary Anastomosis for Lesions of the Left Portion of the ColonPostgraduate Medicine, 1948