Is Hund's Second Rule Responsible for the Orbital Magnetism in Solids?
- 29 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 80 (26) , 5758-5761
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.80.5758
Abstract
We argue that the key parameter responsible for the exchange-correlation enhancement of the orbital magnetic moments in solids is “Hubbard ” rather than the intra-atomic Hund's second rule coupling, being consistent with a more general concept of the orbital polarization. This leads us to a unified rotationally invariant local density approximation prescription for the orbital magnetism. Validity of the present theory is demonstrated by numerical calculations, which perfectly account for the orbital magnetism as well as the canted magnetic structure in CoO.
Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-Interaction Free Relativistic Local Spin Density Approximation: Equivalent of Hund's Rules in-CePhysical Review Letters, 1997
- Total Energy Calculation of the Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy Energy in the FerromagneticMetalsPhysical Review Letters, 1995
- Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulatorsPhysical Review B, 1995
- Magnetic Structures of Uranium Compounds: Effects of Relativity and SymmetryPhysical Review Letters, 1995
- Crystal-field polarization and the insulating gap in FeO, CoO, NiO, andLa2CuO4Physical Review B, 1991
- Orbital polarization in narrow-band systems: Application to volume collapses in light lanthanidesPhysical Review B, 1990
- Orbital Polarization and the Insulating Gap in the Transition-Metal OxidesPhysical Review Letters, 1990
- Orbital polarization and the insulating gap in the transition-metal oxidesPhysical Review Letters, 1990
- Electronic structure of Mott insulatorsAdvances in Physics, 1977
- Band model for magnetism of transition metals in the spin-density-functional formalismJournal of Physics F: Metal Physics, 1976