Two Types of Ventilated Porometers Compared on Broadleaf and Coniferous Species
Open Access
- 1 August 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Plant Physiology
- Vol. 68 (2) , 506-508
- https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.68.2.506
Abstract
Two ventilated porometers (diffusion and steady-state) were compared on four broadleaf and five coniferous species. The diffusion porometer gave consistently lower conductance values for both types of species, reflecting a direct stomatal response to low chamber humidity. At high conductance values, the porometers produced a linear and nearly equal response, but the diffusion porometer was less sensitive at low conductance values. This was due to lower air flow (20% of the velocity in the steady-state porometer) and water vapor sorption (by its acrylic plastic chamber). The broadleaf species had less variation (R2 = 0.81) than did the coniferous species (R2 = 0.61), but, with the latter, there was better correspondence between the two porometers, possibly due to sampling technique. Conductance values were clustered by species.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a ventilated diffusion porometer for the measurement of stomatal diffusion resistance of Douglas-fir needlesArchives for Meteorology Geophysics and Bioclimatology Series A, 1978
- Analysis of Operation and Calibration of a Ventilated Diffusion PorometerPlant Physiology, 1970
- Design Calibration and Field Use of a Stomatal Diffusion PorometerPlant Physiology, 1969