Surface Morphology and its Influence on Adhesion
- 1 October 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Adhesion
- Vol. 12 (4) , 297-315
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00218468108071208
Abstract
Adhesively bonded airplane structures have sometimes failed in the past. Therefore we started an investigation to look for a comparison between strength and pretreatment of adhesive bonds. Materials used were the common airplane aluminium alloys 2024 T 3 and 7075 T 6 in bare and clad state. The methods of pretreatment were the European CSA-process, the European CAA-anodization, the FPL-process, the PAA-anodization, the SAA-anodization and some Chemoxal-processes. The adhesives we used were FM 123–5 and FM 73, both with primer BR 127. Micrographs from the surfaces prepared by the different treatment methods show, in all cases, a different microstructure which is in some cases more or less suitable for a connection with the polymer structure of the adhesive and, therefore, more or less suitable for good adhesion.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The influence of surface pretreatment on the durability of adhesively-bonded aluminium alloys in humid and corrosive environmentsInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1980
- Oxide morphologies on aluminum prepared for adhesive bondingApplications of Surface Science, 1979
- Das Langzeitverhalten von MetallklebverbindungenMaterialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 1977
- Primary Adhesively Bonded Structure Technology (PABST)Journal of Aircraft, 1977