Application of Machine Perfusion Preservation as a Viability Test for Marginal Kidney Graft
- 15 December 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 82 (11) , 1425-1428
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000243733.77706.99
Abstract
This study evaluated the usefulness of machine perfusion preservation parameters as indicators of kidney graft viability. Eighty-eight cadaveric kidneys were analyzed in this study. Of these, 74 kidneys (84.1%) were procured from nonheartbeating donors. The criteria for an acceptable kidney for transplantation were a perfusion flow of more than 0.4 mL/min/g with a concurrent decreasing perfusion pressure. The average perfusion pressure was 30-50 mmHg. We divided the kidneys into three groups: group 1 (n=35), 0.45-0.65 mL/min/g machine perfusion flow (MPF); group 2 (n=30), 0.65-0.90 mL/min/g MPF; and group 3 (n=23), more than 0.9 mL/min/g MPF. A higher rate of primary nonfunction (PNF; 25.7%) was found in group 1, compared with 6.7% in group 2 and 0% in group 3. A higher rate of 30.4% immediate function was found in group 3, compared with 16.7% in group and 8.6% in group 1. However, a longer period of acute tubular necrosis (ATN; 12.0 days) was found in group 1 compared with 8.6 days in group 2 and 8.7 days in group 3. PNF was detected in 7 (77.8%) cases with more than 16 hr of total ischemic time (TIT) in group 1. In contrast, all of nine cases with more than 16 hr of TIT in group 3 were functional. MPF is a reliable indicator of graft viability based on the rate of PNF and immediate renal allograft function, especially in marginal donors.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic reviewClinical Transplantation, 2003
- Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservationClinical Transplantation, 2000
- Successful renal transplantation from non–heart-beating donors with a high creatinineTransplantation Proceedings, 1998
- Role of machine perfusion preservation in kidney transplantation from non‐heartbeating donorsClinical Transplantation, 1998
- Immediate function and cost comparison between static and pulsatile preservation in kidney recipientsClinical Transplantation, 1996
- Pulsatile kidney perfusion for evaluation of high‐risk kidney donors safely expands the donor poolClinical Transplantation, 1994
- A comparison of cadaver donor kidney storage methods: Pump perfusion and cold storage solutionsClinical Transplantation, 1993
- THE FUTURE OF KIDNEY PRESERVATIONTransplantation, 1980