Geriatric Education Part I: Efficacy of a Mandatory Clinical Rotation for Fourth Year Medical Students

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the curriculum of a mandatory, fourth‐year geriatrics clerkship and assess its impact on medical students' knowledge of geriatric medicine and attitudes toward the elderly.Design: One group, before/after trial.Setting: Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York.Participants: Entire fourth year class of medical students (n = 127).Intervention: Four‐week‐long clinical geriatrics clerkship.Measurements: Pre‐ and post‐rotation: test of knowledge; Aging Semantic Differential (ASD) attitude scale; Modified Maxwell‐Sullivan attitude scale; questionnaire.Main Results: Seventy percent of students found the rotation to be educationally valuable; however, only one‐third of students would have taken the clerkship had it not been required. Mean geriatric knowledge score increased by 18.7% (P < 0.001). Mean ASD attitude score did not change significantly (130.5 ± 19.2 pre‐rotation versus 126.6 ± 18.8 post‐rotation, P = 0.15), but students started the rotation with a neutral attitude. Over 90% of students agreed they would welcome elderly into their future practice.Conclusion: If a national curricular goal is to improve medical students' knowledge of geriatric medicine, required rather than elective rotations may be in order.

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit: